<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>aleatory &#187; javascript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/category/javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No Sound Fix for Your Embedded YouTube Video</title>
		<link>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2009/05/22/no-sound-fix-for-your-embedded-youtube-video/</link>
		<comments>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2009/05/22/no-sound-fix-for-your-embedded-youtube-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rutherford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes the embedded (chromeless) YouTube player will fall silent on video playback for an apparently unexplained reason, with no immediate way to fix. I think it has to do with YouTube/flash caching muted sound settings from youtube.com or other non-chromeless player and somewhere along the way these are carried over to your chromeless video.
Just include [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the embedded (chromeless) YouTube player will fall silent on video playback for an apparently unexplained reason, with no immediate way to fix. I think it has to do with YouTube/flash caching muted sound settings from youtube.com or other non-chromeless player and somewhere along the way these are carried over to your chromeless video.</p>
<p>Just include these two calls in the javascript player prior to calling playVideo():<br />
<code><br />
player.unMute();<br />
player.setVolume(10);<br />
</code><br />
thus guaranteeing sound playback regardless of previous state. Similar solution for Actionscript. Further API details at <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/js_api_reference.html">http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/js_api_reference.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2009/05/22/no-sound-fix-for-your-embedded-youtube-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things to Look Forward to in HTML 5</title>
		<link>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2009/01/26/things-to-look-forward-to-in-html-5/</link>
		<comments>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2009/01/26/things-to-look-forward-to-in-html-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rutherford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the HTML 5 spec is being developed with the intention of updating the language to better reflect what it is used for in today&#8217;s web.  Namely web applications.  It notes the rise of third party addons such as Flash and marks itself out as an open alternative.

Real 2-Way Communication between Browser and Web Server &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the HTML 5 spec is being developed with the intention of updating the language to better reflect what it is used for in today&#8217;s web.  Namely web applications.  It notes the rise of third party addons such as Flash and marks itself out as an open alternative.<br />
<br/><br />
<a href="http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#network">Real 2-Way Communication between Browser and Web Server</a> &#8211; no more ajax hacks?<br />
<br/><br />
<a href="http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#crossDocumentMessages">Cross Document Messaging</a> &#8211; a way to allow interdomain communication without resorting to json and without the issue of xss?<br />
<br/><br />
<a href="http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dnd">Real Drag n Drop</a> &#8211; no more ugly multiple browser workarounds or bloated client side apis?<br />
<br/><br />
<a href="http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video">Embedding Video, etc Directly in a Document</a> &#8211; no more cpu-hogging, memory leaking flash-based video sites?<br />
<br/><br />
Firefox  3.1 beta 2 has support for several elements of the spec, including the video element and Canvas (Scripting access to images).  IE8 beta 2 is working on bits and pieces too (Cross Document Messaging) the production release of which is thought to be pencilled in for the first half 2009.Both <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288060(VS.85).aspx">IE</a> &#038; <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/En/HTTP_Access_Control">FF</a> are also having a stab at cross site XmlHttpRequests, which while I think is not specifically referring to the above HTML5 spec, should still provide the necessary power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2009/01/26/things-to-look-forward-to-in-html-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chromed</title>
		<link>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2008/09/03/chromed/</link>
		<comments>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2008/09/03/chromed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rutherford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I arrived late last night to the news that Google has entered the browser wars.  First impressions for me &#8211; something needs to be done about the slowdown/freezing that js-heavy webapps such as gmail create on IE and Firefox.  Having multiple flash based sites open causes similar non-responsive issues.  Chrome&#8217;s js engine, known as V8, responds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I arrived late last night to the news that <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-chrome/">Google has entered the browser wars</a>.  First impressions for me &#8211; something needs to be done about the slowdown/freezing that js-heavy webapps such as gmail create on IE and Firefox.  Having multiple flash based sites open causes similar non-responsive issues.  Chrome&#8217;s js engine, known as V8, <a href="http://www.m0interactive.com/archives/2008/09/03/google_chrome_javascript_benchmark_test.html">responds favourably in benchmarks</a> - although Firefox minions are <a href="http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/">countering this</a>.</p>
<p>It would be nice if respective browser teams could fix these issues and quit with the endless ergonomic tabbed browsing memes.  No one cares where you put them&#8230;</p>
<p> I&#8217;ll not be changing from Firefox (2!) anytime soon though.  I&#8217;ve got too many plugins to drop &#8211; Chrome has no framework in place yet.  And besides, <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1843">Chrome is very much beta</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aleatory.clientsideweb.net/2008/09/03/chromed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
